SMARTER SUPPLY CHAINS. STRONGER BUSINESS.
Supply Chain Partners — Connecting People, Process, Technology

About Supply Chain Partners

Independent thinking. Connected delivery.

Supply Chain Partners Group Limited is a consultancy connecting people, process and technology. Our work brings business analysis, supply chain thinking and collaborative delivery together around each client’s needs.

Why Supply Chain Partners?

End-to-end perspective. The right partners.

Our name reflects how we work. Supply Chains connect organisations, functions and services—and successful change depends on those connections working effectively.

Supply Chain Partners Group Limited connects people, process and technology across the end-to-end Supply Chain. We start with the business need, then consider the changes, expertise and partnerships required to address it.

We bring together the expertise appropriate to an engagement, which may include consulting specialists, technology partners and service providers. The client’s requirements shape the approach.

Advice shaped by your requirements.

Our consultancy advice remains independent of any obligation to recommend a particular software vendor. Where technology is appropriate, we assess its role against your processes, priorities and intended outcomes.

Robert Smith with a container port backdrop

Meet Robert Smith

Understand the problem. Define the possibilities.

Robert’s approach centres on business analysis: understanding how a business works today and what it needs to become.

That means exploring existing processes, identifying pain points and clarifying a client’s vision and aspirations. From there, the focus moves to the target operating model, future processes and a practical roadmap for change.

The answer may involve improving an internal process, clarifying responsibilities or enabling change through technology.

Start a conversation →

Our improvement approach

The SCP continuous improvement approach

Six connected stages. The right techniques for the problem, clear outputs and evidence before moving forward.

Follow stages 1–6. Define acceptance criteria before testing; use test results and UAT evidence to support the authorised acceptance decision.

  1. Problem definition and agreed goals

    Stage 1: Define

    Agree the problem and what success means.

    Techniques
    Requirements, user stories, SIPOC and baseline measures.
    Output
    Agreed scope, owner and initial acceptance criteria.

    Decision

    Are requirements and success measures clear?

  2. Mapping how the current process works

    Stage 2: Understand

    See how the operation actually works.

    Techniques
    Observation, process mapping and data checks.
    Output
    Validated current state and evidence gaps.

    Decision

    Is the evidence reliable enough to diagnose?

  3. Investigating evidence and root causes

    Stage 3: Diagnose

    Test causes and prioritise risks.

    Techniques
    Pareto, fishbone, Five Whys and FMEA.
    Output
    Evidence-supported causes and priority risks.

    Decision

    Do the findings support a change?

  4. Designing the future process and controls

    Stage 4: Design

    Design the change and how to test it.

    Techniques
    Use cases, options appraisal, acceptance criteria and test planning.
    Output
    Selected change and traceable tests, owners and guardrails.

    Decision

    Are acceptance criteria agreed and linked tests ready?

  5. Testing against agreed acceptance criteria

    Stage 5: Test, prove and embed

    Test against agreed criteria before wider rollout.

    Techniques
    Testing, UAT where applicable, measured pilot and training.
    Output
    Test results, UAT evidence where required, defects and pilot outcomes.

    Decision

    Does the evidence support authorised acceptance and rollout?

  6. Monitoring performance and repeating the improvement cycle

    Stage 6: Sustain and improve

    Keep the gains and use what you learn.

    Techniques
    Control plan, performance monitoring and Kaizen.
    Output
    Owned controls, benefits review and next priorities.

    Decision

    Sustain, adapt, stop or begin the next cycle?

Learn, revisit and repeat

Evidence unclear? Return to Understand or Diagnose. Pilot misses the criteria? Revisit Design before rollout. Use the benefits review to agree the next improvement and return to Define.

We select established quality and improvement techniques around the operation, evidence and risk. The scope, responsibilities and delivery arrangements are agreed for each engagement.

What working with us feels like

Professional in our work. Approachable in our relationships.

A structured approach, clear communication and a friendly working style.

Rigour with a purpose.

We use analysis techniques and documentation to make complex problems easier to understand, discuss and resolve.

A shared understanding.

We work alongside client teams to clarify the challenge, explain options and make the decisions ahead easier to communicate.

Open, collaborative conversations.

We want clients to feel comfortable asking questions, challenging assumptions and contributing their operational knowledge throughout an engagement.

Start with a conversation about your operation

Explore the services relevant to your challenge, or speak with us about the decision you need to make.